|

Page Initiated - August 30, 2006
Historian/Web Manager - Bill
'Smokey' Stover
________________________________________

RAO
Bulletin Update 1 September 2006
________________________________________
RAO Bulletin Update
1 September 2006
THIS BULLETIN UPDATE CONTAINS THE
FOLLOWING ARTICLES:
== Agent Orange Lawsuits [04]
-------------- (Offshore
Eligibility)
== VA Presumptive AO Illnesses
[Vets] ---- (AO Impact on Vets)
== VA Presumptive AO Illnesses
[Kids] ---- (AO Impact on Kids)
== Alzheimer’s [01]
--------------------------- (Early
Treatment)
== TFL Claim Processing [02]
---------------- (Opt-out Providers)
== Recruiters
-----------------------------
(Increase in Wrongdoing)
== Recruiters [01]
------------------------ (Sexual
Misconduct)
== Social Security Name Change
------------ (New Rules)
== DFAS Contact Info [01]
-------------------- (Keep Current)
== Computer Tip
--------------------------------
(Email Print Size)
== American Amicable Refunds
-------------- (70,000+ Vets Due)
== Expeditionary Warfare Pin [USN]
------- (Approved 31 JUL 06)
== Air Force Enlistment
-------------------- (Recruits Still
Needed)
== Service Members’ Rights Website
------ (New Website)
== Walter Reed Army Medical Center
------ (Closing in 2011)
== Medicare Part D [07]
----------------- (TFL Mistaken
Enrollment)
== Medicare Part D [08]
----------------------- (Excluded
Medicines)
== VA New York Hospitals:
---------------- (Will Remain Open)
== COLA 2007 [05]
---------------------------- (3.4%
to Date)
== TMOP [05]
-------------------------
(Prescription Savings)
== Captioned Telephone:
------------- (Hearing Impaired
Vets)
== VA Claim Representation [03]
----------- (DAV Opposes S.2694)
== VA Data Privacy Breach [24]
------------- (Data to be Encrypted)
== FDA Assessment
--------------------------- (Lower
Enforcement)
== SBP Open Season [03]
-------------------- (Last Chance)
== Tricare Allowable Charges:
-------------- (New Executive Order)
== Disabled Retiree Back Pay
[02]----------- (Some in OCT)
== Medicare Physical Therapy
Payments --- (Limited in 2007)
== Health Care Quality and Price
------------ (Medical Data Sharing)
== USMC Involuntary Recall ---------
(Individual Ready Reserve)
== AHLTA Update [01]
---------------------- (Problem for
VA)
== Beer Belly Control
------------------------- (1-2 beers
a day OK)
== PI Tricare Provider Certification
--------- (How to)
== Military Legislation Status
---------------- (Where we stand)
AGENT ORANGE LAWSUITS UPDATE 04:
Veterans who patrolled the waters
off Vietnam can now claim disability
benefits for exposure to Agent
Orange under an appeals court ruling
that opens the door for
thousands of servicemen to seek
medical coverage. The ruling was
handed down by the U.S. Court of
Appeals for Veterans Claims in the
case of Haas v. VADC-Nicholson by a
former sailor who served on an
ammunition ship during the Vietnam
War but never stepped foot on
land. The court’s order, issued 16
AUG, reverses the Veterans Affairs
Department’s denial of benefits for
Jonathan L. Haas, who blamed his
diabetes, nerve damage and loss of
eyesight on exposure to Agent
Orange. Haas, represented by the
National Veterans Legal Services
(NVLS) argued that clouds of the
toxic defoliate, which the U.S.
sprayed on Vietnamese jungles,
drifted out to sea, englfing his
ship
and landing on his skin. Veterans
officials said that to qualify for
coverage, Haas was required to have
docked in Vietnam and come
ashore.
The three-judge panel said
regulations governing the benefits
were unclear. The court said it made
no sense for veterans who
patrolled Vietnam’s inland waterways
and those simply passing through
the country to receive medical
coverage while those serving at sea
do
not. “Veterans serving on vessels in
close proximity to land would
have the same risk of exposure to
the herbicide Agent Orange as
veterans serving on adjacent land,
or an even greater risk than that
borne by those veterans who may have
visited and set foot on the land
of the Republic of Vietnam only
briefly,” Judge William A. Moorman
wrote. The Court did not actually
award a disability to Haas, but
sent his case back to the Board for
that determination. If the Board
rules in his favor, the Court
directed that his other Agent
Orange-related medical conditions
also must be compensated. The
Veterans Affairs Department said
Friday that it was reviewing the
opinion and was not sure how many
veterans would be affected or how
much the added coverage would cost.
This VCAA decision could
eventually expand to cover more
veterans than the decision appears
to now cover. During Vietnam
was a short time frame where
military service within the Theater
of
Operations within the Vietnam War
justified the Vietnam Service
Medal. This included waters off the
coast {so called brown water},
deep waters for air operations {so
called blue water operations},
Thailand based Operations for USAF
and other types of operations
which included loading the Agent
Orange aircraft. Most Vietnam
combat veterans receive some medical
benefits, but if their illnesses
are related to their service, they
could receive full coverage and
their families might be eligible for
benefits. David Houppert,
director of veteran’s benefits for
the Vietnam Veterans of America,
said the ruling could allow
thousands of veterans to seek
coverage
for service-related illnesses. Most
are Navy veterans, he said, but
some Marines and Army veterans could
be affected. Houppert said his
group was encouraging these veterans
to seek coverage quickly because
the ruling left it up to government
officials whether to change
federal regulations in a way that
could deny coverage. Vets can
refer to
www.vba.va.gov/bln/21/benefits/herbicide/#bm04
to review
what benefits they could be eligible
for.
As of 20 AUG the VADC-legal
office had not filed a request for a
stay order pending an appeal to the
Supreme Court. The Board of
Veterans' Appeals is sitting at the
Phoenix VARO. The senior judge
has agreed to contact his office in
Washington DC to get current
guidance on implementation of this
decision. The VCAA ruling over
turned a BVA decision on Haas. If
the VADC-Sec Nicholson's office
does not appeal they have no choice
but to grant service connected
for Agent Orange Presumptive
Disabilities with military service
with
in the theater of Vietnam war for
those with the Vietnam Service
Medal. This decision will mean a
potential liability of millions of
dollars to the VA Medical budget and
VA Administrative budget.
Potential claims from the wives of
already deceased Vietnam veterans
could also mean considerable
liability. This helps explain why
the
VADC has been slow to provide
positive guidance about this VCAA
decision. Haas is now the law of
the land and therefore VA must
abide by it. However, it is possible
that VA may amend their
regulations in such a way that it is
adverse to veterans who
otherwise would have benefited from
the court’s decision. Service
organizations are recommending that
other veterans like Mr. Haas who
served offshore but did not set foot
in Vietnam, and who suffer from
diseases or conditions that they
believe to be caused by exposure to
Agent Orange should consider filing
a claim for disability. Members
who have had such claims denied may
wish to re-file based on the
Court's decision. Veterans are
encouraged to seek the advice and
assistance of an experienced
veterans' service organization
before
proceeding. [Source: Associated
Press article 18 Aug & Arizona
Department of Veterans' Services msg
23 Aug 06 ++]
VA PRESUMPTIVE AO ILLNESSES [VETS]:
The following health conditions
are presumptively recognized for
service connection. Vietnam vets
with any of these conditions do not
have to show that the illness is
related to their military service to
get disability compensation. A
current medical diagnosis of the
condition and a DD Form 214 showing
Vietnam Service is normally all that
is needed to accompany a
completed Veterans Application For
Compensation or Pension VA Form
Number 21-526.
1. Chloracne (must occur within 1
year of exposure to Agent Orange).
Chloracne is a skin condition that
looks like common forms of acne
seen in teenagers. The first sign
may be excessive oiliness of the
skin. This is accompanied or
followed by numerous blackheads. In
mild
cases, the blackheads may be limited
to the areas around the eyes
extending to the temples. In more
severe cases, blackheads may appear
in many places, especially over the
cheekbone and other facial areas,
behind the ears, and along the arms.
2. Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. A
group of malignant tumors (cancers)
that
affect the lymph glands and other
lymphatic tissue. These tumors are
relatively rare compared to other
types of cancer, and although
survival rates have improved during
the past two decades, these
diseases tend to be fatal.
3. Hodgkin’s disease. A
malignant lymphoma characterized by
progressive enlargement of the lymph
nodes, liver, and spleen, and by
progressive anemia.
4. Kaposi's sarcoma or
mesothelioma
5. Soft tissue sarcoma other than
osteosarcoma and chondrosarcoma. A
group of different types of
malignant tumors (cancers) that
arise
from body tissues such as muscle,
fat, blood and lymph vessels, and
connective tissues (not in hard
tissue such as bone or cartilage).
These cancers are in the soft tissue
that occurs within and between
organs. The following conditions
fall under the term "soft-tissue
sarcoma):
a. Adult fibrosarcoma
b. Dermatofibrosacoma protuberans
c. Malignant fibrous histicytoma
d. Liposarcoma
e. Leiomyosarcoma
f. Malignant granular cell tumor
g. Alveolar soft part sarcoma
h. Rhabdomysarcoma
i. Ectomesenchymoma
j. Malignant glomus tumor
k. Malignant hemangiopericytoma
l. Malignant Schwannoma
m. Malignant mesenchymoma
n. Epithelioid sarcoma
o. Extraskeletal Ewing's sarcoma
p. Congenital and
infantile fibrosarcoma
q. Malignant ganglioneuroma
r. Epitheloid Leiomysarcoma
(malignant meiomyblastoma)
s. Angiosarcoma
(hemangiosarcoma and
lymphagiosarcoma)
t. Proliferating (systemic)
angioendotheliomatosis
u. Clear cell sarcoma of
tendons and aponeuroses
v. Synovial sarcoma
(malignant synovioma)
w. Malignant giant cell tumor
of tendon sheath
6. Porphyria cutanea tarda (must
occur within 1 year of exposure.)
Porphyria cutanea tarda is a
disorder characterized by
liver dysfunction and by thinning
and
blistering of the skin in
sun-exposed areas.
7. Multiple myeloma. A cancer of
specific bone marrow cells that is
characterized by bone marrow
tumors in various bones of the
body.
8. Respiratory cancers, including
cancers of the lung, larynx,
trachea, and bronchus. (Previously
these conditions must have
manifested within 30 years of the
veteran's departure from Vietnam to
qualify but this 30 year time
limit has now been eliminated.
9. Prostate cancer. A cancer of
the prostate and one of the most
common cancers among men.
10. Peripheral neuropathy
(transient acute or subacute. It
must
appear within 1 year of exposure and
resolve within 2-years of date
of onset.) A nervous system
condition
that causes numbness, tingling, and
muscle weakness. This condition
affects only the peripheral nervous
system, that is, only the nervous
system outside the brain and spinal
cord. Only the transient acute
(short-term) and subacute forms of
this condition (not the chronic
persistent form) have been
associated with herbicide exposure.
11. Diabetes mellitus: Often
referred to as Type 2 diabetes: A
condition characterized by high
blood
sugar levels resulting from
the body’s inability to respond
properly
to the hormone insulin.
12. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
(Final rule and regulations
pending). A disease that progresses
slowly with increasing production of
and older) who live in areas
where it’s offered.
VA health care providers
occasionally see combat veterans
with
multiple unexplained symptoms or
difficult-to-diagnose illnesses that
can cause significant disability.
Two VA centers offer specialized
evaluations for combat veterans with
disabilities related to these
difficult-to-diagnose illnesses. The
War Related Illness and Injury
Study Centers - WRIISCs (pronounced
“risks”) are at the VA Medical
Centers in Washington, DC, and East
Orange, NJ. Veterans who were
deployed to combat zones, served in
areas where hostilities occurred,
or were exposed to environmental
hazards while on duty may be
eligible
for services. [Source: NAUS Weekly
Update for 22 AUG 03 & POVA VSO msg
28 JUL 04]
VA PRESUMPTIVE AO CONDITIONS
[KIDS]: The following health
conditions
are presumptively recognized in
children of veterans for service
connection. Vietnam veteran’s
children with any of these
conditions
do not have to show that their
illness is related to their parent’s
military service to get disability
compensation. A current medical
diagnosis of the condition and a DD
Form 214 showing the parent’s
Vietnam Service is normally all that
is needed to accompany a
completed Veterans Application For
Compensation or Pension VA Form
Number 21-526.
• Spina bifida (except spina
bifida occulta): A neural tube birth
defect that results from the failure
of the bony portion of the spine
to close properly in the developing
fetus during early pregnancy.
• Other (than spinal bifida)
disabilities in the children of
women
Vietnam veterans. Covered birth
defects” means any birth defect
identified by VA as a birth defect
associated with the service of
women Vietnam veterans in Vietnam
from 28 FEB 61 to 7 MAY 75, and
that has resulted, or may result, in
permanent physical or mental
disability. However, the term does
not include a condition due to a
familial (this is, inherited)
disorder; birth-related injury; or
fetal or neonatal infirmity with
other well-established causes.
Covered birth defects include, but
are not limited to, the following
conditions:
1) achondroplasia,
2) cleft lip and cleft palate,
3) congenital heart disease,
4) congenital talipes equinovarus
(clubfoot),
5) esophageal and intestinal
atresia,
6) Hallerman-Streiff syndrome,
7) hip dysplasia,
8) Hirschprung’s disease
(congenital megacolon),
9) hydrocephalus due to
aqueductal stenosis,
10) hypospadias,
11) imperforate anus,
12) neural tube defects,
13) Poland syndrome,
14) pyloric stenosis,
15) syndactyly (fused digits),
16) tracheoesophageal fistula,
17) undescended testicle, and
18) Williams syndrome.
** Not covered are conditions that
are congenital malignant
neoplasms, chromosomal disorders, or
developmental disorders. In
addition, conditions that do not
result in permanent physical or
mental disability are not covered
birth defects. All birth defects
that are not excluded under the
language above are covered birth
defects. (Source: Extracted from
Agent Orange Review, Vol. 19, No 2,
Dated July 2003)
ALZHEIMER’S UPDATE 01: If treatment
to prevent Alzheimer's disease
is going to work, it may have to
begin in middle age — or even
younger, new research by Seattle
scientists suggests. The researchers
found that in people genetically
prone to Alzheimer's, significant
amounts of a brain-clogging protein
start moving from the spinal
fluid to the brain at about age 50
or younger. Previous research has
indicated that Alzheimer's begins
years before symptoms appear. But
this latest work by Dr. Elaine
Peskind, associate director of the
University of Washington Alzheimer's
Disease Research Center at the
VA Puget Sound Health Care System in
Seattle and her colleagues is
the first to look at early signs
across a wide range of ages — from
21 to 88. The research is
particularly significant because
scientists
predict a dramatic increase in
Alzheimer's in the decades ahead.
About
4.5 million people in the United
States have the disease, and
researchers say that could increase
to 16 million by 2050.
Peskind and scientists from five
other medical centers analyzed
the effects of aging and the
presence of a gene connected to
Alzheimer's, APOE4, on 184 adult
volunteers with an average age of 50
and all mentally normal. People with
the APOE4 gene have a higher
Alzheimer's risk because it produces
a sticky protein, called beta
amyloid, in the form of a plaque
that is thought to damage brain
cells. Among the volunteers with
the gene, the level of one
important form of the protein in the
spinal fluid was dramatically
lower in participants 50 and older
than in the younger ones. The
decline in levels possibly begins in
young adulthood in those with
the gene, the scientists report in
the July edition of the Archives
of Neurology. Among the volunteers
without the gene, the protein
levels dropped slowly into old age.
About a quarter of the population
has the APOE4 gene, though there are
other physical factors that also
influence whether a person develops
the disease.
Peskind said more research is
needed to confirm the study's
findings. As part of that effort,
the scientists will follow about
half of the participants, those
older than 60, to see which ones
develop Alzheimer's and to analyze
more spinal-fluid samples. She
predicts that spinal-fluid tests
someday could help identify who will
develop Alzheimer's. Because there
is no cure or vaccine for
Alzheimer's, such tests would be
unwise now, because they could
affect whether someone could obtain
health insurance or
long-term-care insurance, she said.
The four prescription drugs now
available for Alzheimer's merely
ease the symptoms for a few years.
Other drugs are under investigation,
including two at the UW. One is
to remove the plaque. The other is
to prevent its production. But
Peskind predicts it will be many
years before a major drug will be
available to prevent or control the
disease but believes that within
10 years, it will definitely be
possible. [Source: Seattle Times
medical reporter Warren King 11 JUL
06]
TFL CLAIM PROCESSING UPDATE 02:
TRICARE For Life (TFL) beneficiaries
are strongly encouraged to find out
what type of Medicare provider
they have prior to making an
appointment with their health care
professional. If you don't, you may
wind up paying more than you
think. Medicare currently has three
types of providers:
- Opt-out providers: Opt-out
providers have chosen to not see
Medicare patients and cannot submit
claims to the Medicare program.
They are considered nonauthorized
and nonparticipating. If you use a
nonauthorized provider, you will be
responsible for the full bill,
including the portion TRICARE would
have paid.
- Participating providers:
Participating providers are
Medicare-authorized providers who
agree to accept the
Medicare-allowable charge as payment
in full, and who agree to file
claims.
- Nonparticipating providers: A
nonparticipating provider does not
agree to accept the allowable charge
as payment in full, and may or
may not file claims.
Beginning 5 JUN 06, a small number
of TFL beneficiaries who were
treated by providers who "opted-out"
saw their claims denied by both
Medicare and Tricare. This was
incorrect. The TFL claims processor
will automatically reprocess those
claims that were improperly
denied. No action by the beneficiary
is necessary. Tricare will
continue to pay claims at the
Tricare Standard rate for any
Medicare-eligible beneficiary who is
treated by a provider who has
opted-out of Medicare only until 30
SEP 06. After that date, a TFL or
Dual Eligible beneficiary who seeks
care from a provider who has opted
out of Medicare will be responsible
for the entire bill.
About 93% of all doctors accept
Medicare patients (and therefore
also accept Tricare for Life).
Although your present providers
might
be participating at the moment, come
1 JAN 07 many could decide to
opt out of Medicare because of the
scheduled 5.1% reduction in fees
to be paid by Medicare after that
date. When Medicare fees are cut,
TFL payments are also reduced thus
making it less desirable for
providers to see a military
retiree/spouse/surviving spouse. An
AMA
survey of providers in early 2006
indicated that if the payment cuts
kick in, 45% of physicians plan to
either stop accepting or decrease
the number of new Medicare patients
and 43% will either stop
accepting or decrease the number of
new Tricare patients. This
government action and the recently
implemented Tricare third tier
pharmaceutical copay upgrades is
making the lifetime medical care
benefit of retirees much more
restrictive and costly to users. To
find out what type of health care
provider you have, call Medicare
toll-free at 1(800) 633-4227. The
November elections will give
veterans an opportunity to show
Congressional incumbents what they
think of their actions that have
allowed this erosion of our health
care benefit. [Source: MOAA News
Exchange 16 Aug 06 ++]
RECRUITERS: As the military
struggled to attract new troops to
fill
its billets, instances of wrongdoing
by recruiters skyrocketed
between fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2005,
Government Accountability Office
(GAO) investigators concluded in a
report released 14 AUG. Ongoing
operations in Iraq and Afghanistan,
coupled with low U.S.
unemployment rates, have made lining
up new enlistments a challenging
duty, compelling some recruiters to
employ illegal or unethical
tactics to meet their quotas. Cases
of wrongdoing vary widely,
ranging from paperwork errors to
serious allegations, such as sexual
harassment, falsifying documents and
concealing serious medical
conditions. In May, for instance,
The Oregonian reported that the
Army had accepted an autistic
recruit and signed him up to become
a
cavalry scout. The recruit has since
been discharged. The GAO
reported last year, allegations of
wrongdoing among the military's
22,000 recruiters grew by 50% over
fiscal 2004 claims, while
substantiated cases increased by
more than 50%. Criminal violations,
meanwhile, jumped by more than 100%,
The actual number of cases of
wrongdoing may be even higher
than the number provided by GAO,
whose investigators concluded that
many of the services do not have an
effective way to track complaints
and allegations. They contend DoD is
not in a sound position to assure
the general public that it knows the
full extent to which recruiter
irregularities are occurring. Its
investigation follows two other
reports in 1997 and 1998 that
recommended the military improve
performance among recruiters and
reduce the number of violations by
rewarding recruiters for every
enlistee's successful completion of
basic training rather than the
number of enlistment contracts
written
for applicants they attracted.
Rep. Fortney Stark (D-CA) said
in a statement 14 AUG that, “DoD
has twice ignored GAO
recommendations on how best to
account for and
limit recruiters' violations. This
third inquiry confirms the two
prior reports' findings and demands
immediate action." Stark, who
requested the report with House
Armed Services Personnel
Subcommittee
ranking member Vic Snyder (D-AR)
urged the military to take overdue
steps to enforce the Uniformed Code
of Military Justice and called on
the House Armed Services Committee
to increase oversight on the
matter. In 2005, the Army, Army
Reserve and Navy Reserve failed to
meet recruiting goals, however DoD
reported last week that all
services met or exceeded their
recruiting targets for JUL 06.
[Source: GOVEXEC.com Daily Briefing
14 Aug 06 ++]
RECRUITER MISCONDUCT UPDATE 01:
More than 100 young women who
expressed interest in joining the
military in the past year were
preyed upon sexually by their
recruiters. Women were raped on
recruiting office couches, assaulted
in government cars and groped en
route to entrance exams. A six-month
Associated Press investigation
found that more than 80 military
recruiters were disciplined last
year for sexual misconduct with
potential enlistees. The cases
occurred across all branches of the
military and in all regions of
the country. At least 35 Army
recruiters, 18 Marine Corps
recruiters, 18 Navy recruiters and
12 Air Force recruiters were
disciplined for sexual misconduct or
other inappropriate behavior
with potential enlistees in 2005,
according to records obtained by
the AP under dozens of Freedom of
Information Act requests. That’s
significantly more than the handful
of cases disclosed in the past
decade. The AP also found:
• The Army, which accounts for
almost half of the military, has had
722 recruiters accused of rape and
sexual misconduct since 1996.
• Across all services, one out
of 200 frontline recruiters - the
ones
who deal directly with young people
- was disciplined for sexual
misconduct last year.
• Some cases of improper
behavior involved romantic
relationships,
and sometimes those relationships
were initiated by the women.
• Most recruiters found guilty
of sexual misconduct are disciplined
administratively, facing a reduction
in rank or forfeiture of pay;
military and civilian prosecutions
are rare.
• The increase in sexual
misconduct incidents is consistent
with
overall recruiter wrongdoing, which
has increased from just over 400
cases in 2004 to 630 cases in 2005,
according to a General Accounting
Office report released this week.
The Pentagon has committed more
than $1.5 billion to recruiting
efforts this year. Defense
Department spokeswoman Lt. Col.
Ellen
Krenke insisted that each of the
services takes the issue of sexual
misconduct by recruiters very
seriously and has processes in place
to
identify and deal with those members
who act inappropriately. In the
Army 53 of 8000 recruiters were
charged with misconduct last year.
Recruiting spokesman S. Douglas
Smith said the Army has put much
energy into training its staff to
avoid these problems.
For this story, the AP
interviewed victims in their homes
and
perpetrators in jail, read police
and court accounts of assaults and
in one case portions of a victim’s
journal. A pattern emerged. The
sexual misconduct almost always
takes place in recruiting stations,
recruiters apartments or government
vehicles. The victims are
typically between 16 and 18 years
old, and they usually are thinking
about enlisting. They usually meet
the recruiters at their high
schools, but sometimes at malls or
recruiting offices. Not all of the
victims are young women. A former
Former Navy recruiter is serving a
12-year sentence for molesting three
male recruits. One of the
victims is suing him and the Navy
for $1.25 million. The trial is
scheduled for next spring. All of
the recruiters the AP spoke with
said they were routinely alone in
their offices and cars with girls.
Although the Uniform Code of
Military Justice bars recruiters
from having sex with potential
recruits, it also states that age 16
is the legal age of consent. This
means that if a recruiter is caught
having sex with a 16-year-old, and
he can prove it was consensual, he
will likely only face an
administrative reprimand. But not
under new
rules set by the Indiana Army
National Guard. There, a much
stricter
policy, apparently the first of its
kind in the country, was
instituted last year after seven
victims came forward to charge a
National Guard recruiter with rape
and assault. Now, the 164 Army
National Guard recruiters in Indiana
follow a “No One Alone” policy.
Male recruiters cannot be alone in
offices, cars, or anywhere else
with a female enlistee. If they are,
they risk immediate disciplinary
action. Recruiters also face
discipline if they hear of another
recruiter’s misconduct and don’t
report it. At their first meeting,
National Guard applicants, their
parents and school officials are
given wallet-sized “Guard Cards”
advising them of the rules. It
includes a telephone number to call
if they experience anything
unsafe or improper. [Source:
Military.com AP article 21 Aug 06
++]
SOCIAL SECURITY NAME CHANGE: A new
law, the Intelligence Reform and
Terrorism Prevention Act, includes
several provisions that change
rules for assigning a Social
Security number and issuing a Social
Security card. This Social Security
changes became effective 17 DEC
05. It is important to know the
rules for getting a replacement
Social Security card before you
apply. If you need to change your
name on your Social Security card,
you must show proof of your legal
name change. SSA can accept the
following documents as proof of the
legal name change: marriage
document, divorce decree stating you
may
change your name, Certificate of
Naturalization showing your new
name, or a court order for a name
change.
In the past, you could change
the name by showing your driver's
license with the old name and the
document giving the reason for the
name change. The change now
requires an extra step. You must
change
your name on your driver's license
first so that SSA can see a
document with the new name already
on it. You can then use your old
license, the new license (not the
temporary license), and the
document authorizing the name
change. If the document authorizing
a
name change has enough information
on it to identify you, then you
can get the name changed on your
Social Security card without having
to change it on your driver's
license first. Proof of
identification
must include the applicant’s name
and date of birth, Social Security
number, age, parents’ names, or a
photograph. Some name change
documents do not contain this
information, so people will have to
change the name on their driver's
license before changing it on their
Social Security card. SSA must see
original or certified copies of
your documents. Photocopies are not
accepted.
These new rules help ensure
that only those who should receive a
Social Security number do so. They
make Social Security numbers less
accessible to those with criminal
intent and prevent individuals from
using false or stolen birth records
or immigration documents to obtain
a Social Security number. SSNs have
never been reissued after their
owner’s death even though over 420
million SSNs have been issued to
date. The current numbering system
will provide enough new numbers
for several generations into the
future with no changes in the
numbering system. [Source:
www.seniorjournal.com 14 Aug 06]
DFAS CONTACT INFO UPDATE 01: The
Defense Accounting and Finance
Service (DFAS) reminds all military
retirees and annuitants to review
their retirement or annuitant pay
account status to ensure all
information is up-to-date. DFAS
relies on current personal
information to provide their
customer service. Officials
emphasize
that it’s imperative that retirees
notify the agency as soon as
possible about any change in marital
or family status, beneficiaries,
mailing address and bank account
information. This ensures that the
individual’s retirement pay is
processed correctly and on time. If
beneficiary information needs to be
updated, customers can access the
new Designation of Beneficiary form
online at
http://www.dod.mil/dfas/retiredpay/beneficiarycard.html.
Changes to
much of a retiree’s pay account can
be made via myPay AT
http:/mypay.dfas.mil or by
calling the Retired/Annuitant Pay
Customer
Service Center at 1(800) 321-1080.
Retirees may also send an e-mail
via myPay or by regular mail to:
DFAS, U. S. Military Retirement Pay,
P. O. Box 7130, London, KY
40742-7130. Any account changes must
be
completed and submitted by the end
of November 2006 in order to be
effective for the end-of-year
processing (1099R’s, RAS’s, etc.).
This
includes both retired and annuitant
pay accounts. [Source: Air Force
Retiree News Service 17 Aug 06]
COMPUTER TIP: Having trouble
reading the small print in the text
of
your oncoming messages. If so, hold
down the Ctrl key on your key
board and turn the small wheel in
the middle of your mouse. This
will change the print size to either
larger or smaller depending on
which way you turn the wheel.
[Source Tom Kelly, Las Vegas msg 14
Aug 06]
AMERICAN AMICABLE REFUNDS: More
than 70,000 service members and
former service members are due some
$70 million in refunds or policy
upgrades based on a settlement
between American Amicable Insurance
Co. on one side and the Justice
Department, insurance commissioners
from 42 states, Washington, D.C.,
and Guam, and the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the other.
American Amicable does not have to
admit to or deny allegations that it
improperly marketed and sold
insurance to junior ranking service
members. However, American
Amicable may not do business on U.S.
military bases for five years.
In addition, the company is barred
from:
- Using allotment or MyPay forms
for insurance premium funding;
- Accepting applications from
soldiers in pay grades E-1 through
E-3
without proof they have been
counseled according to Army
regulations;
and
- Offering gifts worth more than
$5 to those with direct authority
over service members in pay grades
E-1 through E-4.
[Source: Armed Forces News 18 Aug 06
&
www.gainsurance.org. ]
EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE PIN: The
Navy’s Enlisted Expeditionary
Warfare
(EXW) Specialist qualification
program and pin were approved 31 JUL
06. The pin, which will be
equivalent to the Navy’s other
warfare
qualification designations, could be
initially awarded to as many as
40,000 Sailors within six months.
The EXW pin will be available to
Sailors assigned to SEAL units under
Navy Special Operations Command
if the units institute a
qualification program to be mandated
by a
pending Navy instruction. According
to Command Master Chief (EWS/SW)
of the Naval Expeditionary Combat
Command (NECC). the pin will not be
available initially to Sailors on
individual augmentee (IA) tours with
the Army because it is being
established for Sailors qualifying
with
expeditionary skills involved with
maritime security. That exclusion
could change if the IA program moves
to the NECC. [Source: Armed
Forces News 18 Aug 06]
AIR FORCE ENLISTMENT: The Air Force
says that, despite rumors to the
contrary, the service is still
recruiting. Next year’s recruiting
goals have been reduced by nine
percent in comparison to the numbers
sought in 2006. Nevertheless,
according to the Air Force
Recruiting
Service Operations Division
superintendent, the Air Force is
still
hiring a mix of people in all of its
career fields. The service is
seeking 27,760 high school graduates
or the equivalent, ages 17-28,
to join its enlisted ranks from
October to September 2007. The Air
Force is also looking for 482
college graduates to join its
officer
corps. The most available positions
are pilot, combat systems officer
(navigator), air battle management
and electrical engineering. After
the 482 Officer Training School
positions are filled, additional
applications will move out to fill
the following year’s jobs. For
more information about Air Force
careers, visit
www.airforce.com.
[Source: Armed Forces News 18 Aug
06]
SERVICE MEMBERS’ RIGHTS WEBSITE:
Attorney General Alberto R.
Gonzalez announced 14 AUG a new Web
site that would help the Justice
Department keep civil rights laws
for American service members a
priority. The Justice Department
Web site,
www.servicemembers.gov,
outlines the rights service members
have under the Uniformed Services
Employment and Reemployment Rights
Act, the Uniformed and Overseas
Citizens Absentee Voting Act and the
Service Members Civil Relief
Act. The attorney general said
these are not just “pie in the sky”
rights, but issues that directly
affect people. Mr. Gonzales urged
any service member with questions to
go to the Justice Department Web
site. Military lawyers can help
service members and their families
navigate through the laws. [Source:
NGAUS NOTES 18 Aug 06]
WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER:
Officials at Walter Reed Army
Medical Center announced 16 AUG the
construction of a temporary
medical annex at the hospital to
provide better facilities for
wounded troops undergoing
post-amputation care. The
30,000-square-foot addition is being
built onto Walter Reed’s general
medical facility building and will
be called the U.S. Army Amputee
Patient Care Center. According to
retired Col. Charles Scoville, the
future director of the annex upon
completion will improve the
capabilities to return soldiers to
the highest level of function. The
annex will provide better facilities
and equipment as well as
additional room. Groundbreaking for
the facility has been initiated
with completion slated by OCT 07.
Walter Reed’s amputee care
facility mostly treats wounded
soldiers since the war on terror
began, as well as some Marines
transferred from the National Naval
Medical Center, in Bethesda, MD. The
daily amputee care caseload
averages eight to 10 inpatients and
around 75 to 100 outpatients.
The facility admits 10 to 15 new
patients each month. Walter Reed
will close in 2011 as part of the
2005 Base Realignment and Closure
Act. Amputee recovery services at
Walter Reed will be moved into a
new joint medical facility to be
built in Bethesda, and other
patients will be moved to Fort
Belvoir VA. [Source: NGAUS NOTES 18
Aug 06]
MEDICARE PART D UPDATE 07: Per
Express Scripts, some people that
are
Tricare For Life members were
automatically enrolled in Part D and
are now experiencing difficulties
getting their prescriptions. The
number automatically enrolled is
unknown but there are 129,000
Tricare beneficiaries that are
enrolled in Part D. Very few
actually
benefit from Part D unless they
qualify for Part D with no premiums.
Express Scripts is recommending the
pharmacy process the Rx under
Part D and then it will go to
Tricare for the balance.
Beneficiaries
are told to contact Medicare to
disenroll from Part D and obtain a
letter from Medicare. The letter
then should be faxed to (831) 583
2340 Defense Manpower Data Center
(DMDC) (formerly DSO) and the Part
D will be removed from DEERS within
24 hours. DMDC can also
accommodate DEERs change of address
inputs at
www.dmdc.osd.mil/udpdri/owa/change.address.
Express Scripts is
working with TMA to determine the
best resolution of the inadvertent
TFL user’s automatic Part D signup.
[Source: NAUS Weekly Update 18
Aug 06 ++]
MEDICARE PART D UPDATE 08: Under the
2003 Medicare drug legislation,
coverage was provided for most
medically necessary drugs. Yet
millions of seniors are learning
which prescription medications are
covered under their drug plans and
which are not. Considerable
attention has been devoted to the
fact that Part D plans are
permitted to limit the coverage of
drugs through the use of
formularies, “step therapy”
(requiring that patients first try
less
expensive drugs), prior
authorization, and quantity limits.
Less well
known, however, is the fact that
nine entire categories of drugs were
excluded under the Medicare
Modernization Act of 2003 Part D
legislation. Medicare will not
cover them under any circumstance.
These excluded drugs include:
1. Agents when used for anorexia,
weight loss, or weight gain
2. Agents when used to promote
fertility
3. Agents when used for cosmetic
purposes or hair growth
4. Agents when used for the
symptomatic relief of cough and
colds
5. Prescription vitamins and
mineral products, except prenatal
vitamins and fluoride preparations
6. Nonprescription drugs
7. Outpatient drugs for which the
manufacturer seeks to require
associated tests or monitoring
services be purchased exclusively
from
the manufacturer or its designee as
a condition of sale
8. Barbiturates
9. Benzodiazepines
Some of the drugs have been the
subject of controversy for years,
and
this no doubt led to their
exclusion. Those drugs have
significant
side effects that may be exacerbated
in older patients, such as
over-sedation causing falls and hip
fractures, and addiction. In
addition, when Congress considered
legislation to add a prescription
drug benefit, many of the major
bills advanced by both Democrats and
Republicans adopted some or all of
the categories of drugs that are
excluded under state Medicaid
programs, and excluded them from
coverage under Medicare. The TRAS
Senior citizens League (TSCL)
questions some of the exclusions.
Particularly those of drugs that
are currently covered under most
state Medicaid programs. The
blanket exclusion of medically
necessary drugs could result in
serious harm to Medicare
beneficiaries who really need them.
TSCL is
studying the issue and believes that
certain categories could be
legitimately modified by the
Secretary of the Department of
Health
and Human Services, for coverage
under Part D. [Source: TSCL Social
Security Advisor 26 Aug 06]
VA NEW YORK HOSPITALS: VA Secretary
Nicholson announced that the VA
will keep both the Manhattan and the
Brooklyn VA medical centers open
and will make major renovations and
improvements at the St. Albans VA
Medical Center in Queens. There has
been an ongoing 2 year analysis
studying if the centers should be
consolidated. The decision was
based both for the convenience of
the veterans and the VA’s desire to
continue retain its close ties with
NYU’s Medical School and the
medical school of the State
University of New York. The
Secretary
also said he wanted to personally
thank the local advisory panels for
the Manhattan/Brooklyn study and the
St. Albans study, along with many
others, including the New York
congressional delegation, veterans
groups, city and state leaders,
other stakeholders and VA employees
which have guided VA in these
decisions [Source: TREA Leg Up 18
Aug
06]
COLA 2007 UPDATE 05:. In mid-August,
the Bureau of Labor Statistics
announced the JUL 06 monthly
Consumer Price Index (CPI), which is
used to calculate the annual
cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) for
military retired pay, VA disability
compensation, survivor annuities,
and Social Security. The CPI
continued its upward trend, rising
another 0.3% in July -- for a
cumulative increase of 3.4% so far
this
fiscal year. Once again, a large
share of the increase was due to a
jump in energy prices. The July
CPI-W contained a 3.1% increase in
energy costs and a 1.8% increase in
transportation costs which
influenced the increase in
inflation. Last year, the CPI had
risen
3.2% through the month of July and
ended up the year at 4.1%. With
inflation running slightly ahead of
last year's pace so far, it would
seem likely that we'll end this year
in the same ballpark. We can
still hope that inflation in the
last two months of this year may not
match last year's experience, when
Hurricane Katrina sent energy
prices soaring. For more
information, For more information,
visit
www.moaa.org/controller.asp?pagename=lac_issues_second_career_cola
[Source: MOAA Leg Up 18 Aug 06]
TMOP UPDATE 05: Tricare's
mail-order pharmacy (TMOP) is
getting a
lot of legislative attention, and
military beneficiaries would do
well to pay attention. Each
prescription dispensed through the
mail-order system saves the Pentagon
an average of $50 to $150
dollars, depending on what's
counted. Also, those who use TMOP
save
67% because they get a three-month
supply for the same copayment that
buys only a one-month supply in a
retail pharmacy. But for whatever
reason, only 6% of prescriptions are
currently filled through the
mail-order system, and the most
rapid growth is in the retail system
– the one that's most expensive for
both the government and
beneficiaries.
MOAA believes there are several
reasons for underutilization of the
TMOP, including a lack of publicity
about it by the Defense
Department and beneficiaries'
reluctance to change what has worked
for them in the past, even if the
change would save them a modest
amount of money.
The cost difference is a big
deal for the government, and
Congress is determined to do all it
can to encourage use of the
much-cheaper mail-order program. One
way is to significantly sweeten
the program for beneficiaries, and
both the House and the Senate put
provisions in the FY2007 Defense
Authorization Bill that will
eliminate any copayment for most
drugs obtained through the
mail-order system. That should make
using the mail-order system a
no-brainer for the vast majority of
people who use long-term
maintenance medications. Why pay a
copayment or make an extended
trip to a military installation if
you can get the same medications
delivered right to your doorstep --
for free? But some in Congress
aren't convinced that voluntary
incentives will generate enough
migration to TMOP. So the Senate
also passed a provision that would
require military beneficiaries to
obtain all refill prescriptions of
maintenance medications through
TMOP. The Military Coalition (TMC)
thinks that's going too far. There
are some instances when the
mail-order system isn't appropriate
or efficient - such as when the
doctor changes the dosage or when
replacing lost medication.
Another way to reduce
government costs is to require drug
companies to provide the defense
department the same prices through
the retail system that it charges
for drugs dispensed through
military and VA facilities. The
Senate version of the defense bill
would do that, but the
Administration's Office of
Management and
Budget is opposing that provision -
seemingly putting the interests
of the drug companies ahead of the
Defense Department's. TMC supports
the Senate provision requiring
reduced retail drug prices and
heartily
endorses elimination of any
beneficiary copayments for drugs
obtained
through the mail-order system. TMC
opposes mandatory refills of
maintenance medications through the
mail-order system. That doesn't
allow enough latitude for individual
circumstances - especially when
White House budgeteers are taking
the drug companies’ side in
opposing consistent price discounts
for all military-purchased drugs.
Our legislators need to be told by
their constituents how they feel
about the NDAA proposed changes. It
is not too late to influence the
Compromise Committee’s vote on the
2007 NDAA content. [Source: MOAA
Leg Up 18Aug 06]
CAPTIONED TELEPHONE: Captioned
Telephone (CapTel) service is
available in the vast majority of
states, for the hearing impaired.
This is a new telephone technology
that allows people to receive
word-for-word captions of their
telephone conversations. It is
similar in concept to Captioned
Television, where spoken words
appear
as written text for viewers to read.
The CapTel phone looks and works
like any traditional phone, with
callers talking and listening to
each other, but with one very
significant difference of captions
being provided live for every phone
call. The captions are displayed
on the phone's built-in screen so
the user can read the words while
listening to the voice of the other
party. Thus, if the CapTel phone
user has difficulty hearing what the
caller says, he can read the
captions for clarification. In many
states, CapTel equipment is
provided free or at a reduced rate
to people with hearing loss. You
can check the specifics of your
state at
www.captionedtelephone.com/availability.phtml.
There is no cost for
using the CapTel captioning service
which is provided free as part of
your state's relay service. Veterans
and retired federal (civilian &
military) employees can qualify for
a free CapTel phone if they:
- Have a hearing loss; and
- Complete an application form
availble at
www.captionedtelephone.com/Federal_CapTel_Vet_App.pdf;
and
- Submit offical verification of
their retirement status (i.e.
DD-214, SF50 or other official
verification)
Signed applications should be mailed
to: Sprint-Federal Relay, Attn:
Free CapTel Phone, 401Ninth St., NW,
Ste 400, Washington DC or via
Fax to (202) 585-1841. Federally
recognized U.S. Tribal member are
also eligible. For additional
information refer to
www.captionedtelephone.com.
[Source: Paul Hart msg 15 Aug 06]
VA CLAIM REPRESENTATION UPDATE 03:
According to Disabled American
Veterans National Commander Bradley
S. Barton, federal legislation
that would allow lawyers to charge
veterans for helping them file a
claim for benefits from the
Department of Veterans Affairs is
unnecessary and would increase costs
to veterans. Barton, who is
himself an attorney and a veteran’s
advocate, said veterans should
not have to hire and pay a lawyer to
help them with the largely
administrative claims process which
is designed to be open, informal
and helpful to veterans. He
disagrees with what the Senate
passed
Veterans’ Choice of Representation
Act would do because:
- Involvement of lawyers would
increase costs to veterans and to
the
VA without significantly improving
the process.
- The VA is required to assist
veterans in completing and filing
the
relatively informal application for
benefits and then takes the
initiative to advance the claim
through the appropriate steps.
- Veterans can get free help
from the DAV’s professionally
trained
National Service Officers or other
organizations in navigating the VA
claims process.
The VA is also opposed to the
legislation, noting that attorney
fees would consume significant
amounts of payments under programs
meant to benefit veterans. If
enacted the VA would have to create
a
substantial new bureaucracy to
perform the additional accreditation
and oversight responsibilities.
Instead the VA should use its scarce
resources to hire more claims
adjudicators and provide them with
the
training needed to improve the
quality as well as timeliness of
decisions. Unfortunately there has
been no indication that the VA
would take this tack and the backlog
of claims continues to grow.
Congress placed the duty on the VA
to ensure all alternative theories
of entitlement are exhausted and all
laws and regulations pertinent to
the case are considered and applied.
Under present regulations
veterans may hire an attorney for
advice and counseling prior to
filing a claim for benefits or after
the VA administrative
proceedings have been completed.
There does not appear to be any
evidence that attorneys would
provide service superior to that
rendered by veterans service
organization (VSO) representatives.
In fiscal year 2005, the Board of
Veterans’ Appeals granted one or
more of the benefits sought in 21.3%
of the appeals in which claimants
were represented by attorneys, who
have the luxury of hand picking
their clients. The board granted one
or more of the benefits sought in
22.3% of the cases in which a
claimant was represented by a
veterans’ service organization. The
1.3 million-member Disabled American
Veterans, a non-profit
organization founded in 1920 and
chartered by the U.S. Congress in
1932, represents this nation’s
disabled veterans. Its sole purpose
is
building better lives for our
nation’s disabled veterans and their
families. [Source: DAV News Release
18 Aug 06 ++]
VA DATA PRIVACY BREACH UPDATE 24:
Although some might think of it as
locking the barn door after the
horse got out, the VA announced 14
AUG
it will be improving data encryption
on its computer systems to make
it harder to copy or misuse personal
information. VA Secretary R.
James Nicholson announced a $3.7
million contract was signed 1 AUG
with a Syracuse, N.Y., business, SMS
Inc., which is a small business
owned by a disabled veteran. Under
the contract, all computers will
receive encryption programs,
starting with laptops and then
desktops.
Devices that transfer data, such as
compact discs, portable hard
drives and flash drives, also will
have security encryption. The VA
announcement said. two software
programs will be used which are now
undergoing final tests. Program
installation on laptops could start
as early as 18 AUG. The statement
estimates it will take four weeks
for installation on all VA laptop
computers. [Source: NavyTimes staff
writer Rick Maze article 14 Aug 06
++]
FDA ASSESSMENT: Timed to coincide
with the Food and Drug
Administration’s (FDA) 100th
anniversary, a new report by Rep.
Henry
A. Waxman (D-CA) examines how the
Bush Administration has carried out
FDA’s enforcement responsibilities.
The report is based on a 15-month
investigation that included a review
of thousands of pages of internal
agency records. Concluding that FDA
enforcement has dropped
precipitously over the last five
years, the report states:
**The number of warning letters
issued by the agency for violations
of federal requirements has fallen
by over 50%, from 1,154 in 2000 to
535 in 2005, a 15-year low. During
the same period, the number of
seizures of mislabeled, defective,
and dangerous products has
declined by 44%.
**In at least 138 cases over the
last five years involving drugs and
biological products, FDA failed to
take enforcement actions despite
receiving recommendations from
agency field inspectors describing
violations of FDA requirements.
**Although the Federal Records Act
and internal agency procedures
require FDA to keep records that
document agency enforcement
decisions, FDA does not appear to
comply with these requirements.
FDA’s response to Committee requests
for relevant enforcement
documents was haphazard, incomplete,
and untimely.
FDA officials explained that
FDA could not provide prompt and
complete responses because the
agency lacks a system that enables
it
to track enforcement recommendations
from field offices. The report
entitled Prescription for Harm: The
Decline in FDA Enforcement
Activity. U.S. House of
Representatives Committee on
Government
Reform Minority Staff Special
Investigations Division, June 2006
can
be viewed at
www.casewatch.org/fda/waxman/prescription_for_harm.pdf
.
For additional documents, refer to
www.democrats.reform.house.gov/story.asp?ID=1074&Issue=Prescription+Drugs
. [Source: Consumer Health Digest
Weekly Update 22 Aug 06]
SBP OPEN SEASON UPDATE 03: SBP Open
Enrollment period signup for
increased SBP coverage terminates 30
SEP 06 and none of the services
have experienced any great influx of
applications. T he less than
staggering numbers is attributed to
the significant buy-in costs
faced by retired members who have
been retired a long time. Even with
large buy-in costs mandated by
Congress to ensure the integrity of
the
fund is maintained, officials still
feel that the SBP is a tremendous
bargain. To match the SBP would
take a high-dollar insurance policy
with premiums beyond the reach of
most. In addition, retired members
don’t have to take physical exams to
get into the SBP. Two provisions
enacted in recent years make the SBP
even more attractive:
1. Phased in elimination of the
Social Security offset, which
previously meant a widow’s annuity
payment dropped from 55% of the
selected base amount to 35% when the
surviving spouse reached the age
of 62. Payments to surviving spouses
increased to 40% on the base
amount on 1 OCT 05 and to 45% 1 APR
06 SBP payments will go to 50% on
` APR 07 and 55% on 1 APR 08.
2. Enactment of a paid-up
provision which means that beginning
1 OCT
08, retired members who are age 70
and older and who have paid into
the SBP for 30 years will no longer
have to pay premiums. Retired
members, who buy-in during the
current SBP enrollment period, GAIN
CREDIT BACK TO THE TIME THEY FIRST
BECAME ELIGIBLE TO ELECT SBP
COVERAGE, meaning that some will pay
monthly premiums for just over
two more years.
Those who took SBP coverage and
later elected to terminate that
coverage are not eligible to make an
open enrollment election. Open
enrollment elections require a lump
sum buy-in premium as well as
future monthly premiums. The lump
sum equates to all back premiums,
plus interest, from the date of
original eligibility to make an
election plus any amount needed to
protect the Military Retirement
Fund. The latter amount applies
almost exclusively to those paying
fewer than seven years of back
payments. The lump sum buy-in
premium
can be paid over a two-year period.
Monthly premiums for spouse or
former spouse coverage will be 6.5%
of the coverage elected, the same
premium paid by those currently
enrolled. Reserve component members
under age 60 and not yet eligible
for retired pay do not pay back
premiums or interest, but must pay a
monthly SBP premium “add-on”
once their retired pay starts.
Elections are effective the first
day
of the month after the election is
received.
To make an open enrollment
election, a retiree must complete
and
submit a DD Form 2656-9, “Survivor
Benefit Plan (SBP) and Reserve
Component Survivor Benefit Plan
(RCSBP) Open Enrollment Election.”
available at
www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/infomgt/forms/eforms/dd2656-9.pdf.
For
assistance with the form, retired
members should contact the office
managing the SBP for their Service.
Air Force retirees should call 1
(800) 531-7502 anytime between 0730
& 1630 CST, M-F except holidays.
Those residing outside the CONUS may
need to obtain an AT&T direct
access number to call the SBP
toll-free number. If someone other
than
the retired member calls for
information, that person should have
the
retiree’s most recent retiree pay
statement available. Privacy Act
restrictions do not permit SBP
counselors to access the retiree’s
account for a second party. Mail the
completed form to the address
specified on the form. Applicants
will be formally notified of their
cost and have 30 days from the date
of the notice to cancel the
election by notifying the Defense
Finance and Accounting Service or
the reserve component, as
applicable, in writing. [Source:
Afterburner Aug 06 ++]
TRICARE ALLOWABLE CHARGES:
President Bush signed an Executive
Order
on 22 AUG titled “Promoting Quality
and Efficient Health Care in
Federal Government Administered and
Sponsored Health Care Programs,”
directing federal agencies that
administer health care programs to
take steps to promote quality care.
It also states that agencies must
do these three things: create
incentives for beneficiaries to care
about the quality and price of their
health programs; address
interoperability of health
information technology products; and
make
health information more transparent
to consumers. To support this
and other health initiatives in the
President’s Management Agenda,
the Department of Defense has
initiated several activities
intended
to realize the promise of improved
and more efficient health care for
all beneficiaries of the Military
Health System (MHS).
In one initiative, Tricare is
partnering with industry, current
health managers and providers, who
contract with DoD in developing
robust measures of quality health
care that can be consistently
applied by the MHS as a unified
effort. These ongoing “data quality
summits” are developing a core set
of metrics that will enable both
MHS leaders and beneficiaries in
making sound decisions about health
choices. In another initiative, the
MHS is actively engaged in
strategic partnerships with both the
public and private sectors to
advance health care information
science and to promote and define
standards for health information
technology systems interoperability.
DoD has made significant progress
advancing health care information
technology through large-scale
adoption and deployment of AHLTA
which
is nearing full implementation
In still another initiative to
promote transparency of health
care pricing and quality, TRICARE
has posted its allowable charges on
an easy-to-use site at
www.tricare.osd.mil/allowablecharges.
The cost
of medical care varies widely across
the country. Neither hospitals
nor doctors’ offices typically post
their charges for various
procedures, making it hard for
patients to judge if they are being
charged a reasonable amount for
operations or examinations. By
making
its charges easily available to the
public, Tricare is leveling the
playing field between medical
service providers and users. The new
Web site shows the Tricare maximum
allowable charge tables, listing
the most frequently used procedures
- more than 300 of them - and the
amount Tricare is legally allowed to
pay for them. These charges are
tied to Medicare allowable charges,
effectively making them a federal
standard for health care costs.
[Source: DoD News Release 22 Aug 06]
DISABLED RETIREE BACK PAY UPDATE
02: If all goes as planned some
disabled retirees due retroactive
pay could start to see their
payments in mid-October according to
DoD and VA (VA) sources. A
small number may see payments before
that; however, VA officials
caution that, if any unexpected
glitches crop up, the payments will
be delayed until the second half of
January. That's because they'll
have their hands full at the end of
the year reprogramming and
implementing new pay rates for 2007.
Over 100,000 retirees now drawing
either Combat Related Special
Compensation (CRSC) or Concurrent
Retirement and Disability Pay
(CRDP) ultimately will receive back
payments and that number is
growing daily with new awards.
Because of the complexity of
calculating who is due how much the
majority of the payments will
likely be phased in from January
through next summer. This is because
individual circumstances vary widely
and many cases require manual
review.
Why is retroactive pay due?
While the VA disability award
letter usually establishes a
retroactive effective date, the VA
doesn't initially make retroactive
payments for retirees with less
than a 100% disability rating.
That's because there's usually at
least some offset required for
retired pay already received. If
the
VA paid all retroactive awards
immediately, it would cause major
headaches for many disabled
retirees, who would then have to pay
back
large amounts of their military
retired pay. Only if and when a
disabled retiree is awarded CRDP or
CRSC can the VA find out whether
back disability pay is due – but it
needs a ton of data from the
Defense Department to figure out how
much. On the other hand,
retirees who experience changes in
their disability awards may also
be due retroactive CRSC/CRDP
payments from the Defense
Department.
The bottom line is that the new
and complicated CRSC and CRDP
programs have created major
administrative and budgetary
headaches
for Pentagon and VA administrators.
Their first priority has been to
get the pays started while
minimizing confusion or aggravation
for
disabled retirees. Now, they've
invested months of combined effort
to change their policies, systems,
and budgets to finish the hard
part – figuring out who is due how
much in retroactive payments.
Defense Finance and Accounting
Service (DFAS) sources say the
affected retirees will receive
specific details at the time their
retroactive payment is made. DFAS
expects to publish a detailed news
release later this month. [Source:
MOAA Leg Up 25 Aug 06]
MEDICARE PHYSICAL THERAPY PAYMENTS:
Barring congressional action
before the end of 2006, Medicare
payments for outpatient physical
therapy will be limited to a flat
$1,740 a year, starting in JAN 07.
But a bipartisan effort is underway
in the House to change the law and
suspend the payment cap.
The cap on outpatient physical,
speech-language and occupational
therapy services by any providers
other than hospital outpatient
departments was put in law by the
Balanced Budget Act of 1997. That
law required a combined cap for
physical therapy and speech-language
pathology, and a separate cap for
occupational therapy, but Congress
delayed its implementation for
several years. The $1,740 annual cap
went into affect in JAN 06, but
Congress authorized an exception if
such services are determined to be
"medically necessary" -- which
most certainly are. But this
exception is due to expire at the
end
of 2006.
In May, Reps. Benjamin Cardin
(D-MD) and Philip English (R-PA)
authored a bipartisan letter urging
the leaders of the Ways and Means
and Energy and Commerce Committees,
which oversee the Medicare payment
issue, to repeal the cap. At the
very least, the letter said, the
medical necessity exception should
be extended through 2007. 177
representatives joined Cardin and
English in signing the letter.
Absent a repeal of the cap or
extension of the exception, Tricare
For
Life (TFL) beneficiaries will
experience more out-of-pocket
expenses
and may have to seek these services
in a hospital setting. Military
eligibles will have some protection
in that TFL will become primary
payer after the Medicare cap is
reached, but Tricare deductibles and
copays apply after that point.
H.R.916 & S.438 have been introduced
in Congress to repeal the increase.
To support these bills refer to
http://capwiz.com/moaa/issues/bills/?bill=7103976
to contact your
Representative or to
http://capwiz.com/moaa/issues/bills/?bill=7103896
to contact your
Senator. [Source: MOAA Leg Up 25 Aug
06]
HEALTH CARE QUALITY AND PRICE: On
22 AUG President Bush signed an
Executive Order designed to promote
more efficient sharing of medical
data between government agencies. In
the executive order, the
President said, “It is the purpose
of this order to ensure that
health care programs administered or
sponsored by the federal
government promote quality and
efficient delivery of health care
through the use of health
information technology, transparency
regarding health care quality and
price, and better incentives for
program beneficiaries, enrollees and
providers.” In effect, the
President tells providers in order
to do business with the federal
government have to show the
government their prices. It
requires
that four major government agencies,
DoD, Department of Health and
Human Services, OPM and the VA,
gather and share information about
the quality and price of medical
care. These four agencies provide
coverage to nearly 25 percent of all
Americans with health
insurance.
The agencies covered by the
order must establish programs
designed to measure quality of care.
The beneficiaries must also be
able to see the prices these
agencies pay for common medical
procedures, to develop and identify
practices that encourage high
quality care, and whenever possible,
use compatible computer systems
and electronic health records to
help track a beneficiary’s medical
care and condition. These changes
and new procedures must be
underway by 1 JAN 07. The Executive
Order should have the effect of
improving quality and efficiency and
ensure “Seamless Transition”
from active to inactive service is
given a higher priority than it
currently enjoys. The entire
Executive Order may be seen on the
web
at
www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/08/20060822-2.html.
[Source:
NAUS Weekly Update 25 Aug 06]
USMC INVOLUNTARY RECALL: Due to
projected shortages in some
specialties such as engineers,
intelligence, military police and
communications, the Marine Corps on
22 AUG announced that they will
shortly begin involuntary recalls.
They will begin by calling up 2500
members at a time, of the Individual
Ready Reserve. They have decided
to exempt those who are either in
the first or last year of their
reserve status. Marines can expect
to be deployed for an average of
12-18 months but could be for as
long as two years. They will receive
five months to prepare before having
to report for duty. [Source: NAUS
Weekly Update 25 Aug 06]
AHLTA UPDATE 01: William
Winkenwerder Jr., assistant
secretary of
defense for health affairs, took
time during a 23 AUG teleconference
with journalists to tout his
department’s ability to transfer
electronically the medical records
of separating service members to
the VA. His comments came in
unveiling a new DoD instruction on
deployment health which is a
compilation of policy decisions
taken
over the last four years to enhance
force health protection
dramatically. Two of the initiatives
are new.
- First, DoD is committed, as
capabilities allow, to collecting
data
daily on the location of every
service member deployed. This will
allow officials to link
environmental monitoring data to
individual
deployments and, over time,
correlate exposure data to veterans’
health.
- Second, DoD will extend all
health protection measures to
deployed
DoD civilian employees and
contractors as well as service
members.
In praising DoD’s system,
Winkenwerder ignored a rising chorus
of
critics who say AHLTA, the
Department of Defense’s digitalized
medical record system, is a problem
for the VA and for veterans
because, in fact, it doesn’t allow
electronic record transfers
outside the military network. The
critics include the Government
Accountability Office, senior VA
officials and, most recently, the
chairmen of the both the House and
Senate veterans’ affairs
committees. GAO reported last month
that the biggest obstacle
remaining for severely wounded
troops to experience “seamless
transition” from military care to VA
trauma centers is the inability
to transfer AHLTA records.
Through June, more than 19,000
service members had been wounded
in Iraq and Afghanistan. Sixty-five
percent had blast injuries,
which often result in trauma
requiring comprehensive
rehabilitation.
GAO said that nearly 200 severely
wounded members, while still on
active duty, have been transferred
to a VA poly-trauma centers for
care and rehabilitation. Most of
these cases involve brain injury,
missing limbs and spinal cord
injuries. GAO acknowledges that VA
and
DoD have strengthened procedures for
transferring war-injured members
and veterans. Their joint programs
have eased hassles for patients and
families. VA social workers are
assigned to large military treatment
facilities to coordinate transfers.
Military liaisons have been
added to VA staff at poly-trauma
centers to handle transition issues
raised there. But GAO said there are
problems electronically sharing
the medical records VA needs to
determine whether service members
are
medically stable enough to
participate in vigorous
rehabilitation
activities. DoD radiological images,
vision and hearing tests, and
anesthesia notes cannot be
transferred electronically. Also,
DOD has
no system-wide approach to
electronic medical record
management..
Information is maintained and stored
at individual treatment
facilities or in networks of
facilities rather than system wide.
GAO
noted, for example, that health care
providers at Walter Reed Army
Medical Center and the National
Naval Medical Center can access each
other’s electronic medical records
but cannot access medical records
from Landstuhl Regional Medical
Center in Germany.
Perhaps the most obvious
weakness of AHLTA, said GAO, is it
captures outpatient records only.
VA needs inpatient records to
provide follow-care and
rehabilitation. As of APR 06,
Walter Reed
Army Medical Center still had to fax
records to VA poly-trauma
centers. Rear Adm. John M. Mateczun,
Navy’s deputy surgeon general,
said military patients transferred
to the VA can arrive with a
digitized medical record. It must
be brought over on a computer disk
and read by an offline computer. But
the record can’t be transmitted
by AHLTA nor can it be integrated
into the VA’s VISTA record system.
Winkenwerder suggested AHLTA is the
more sophisticated system. Asked
to reconcile his rosy view of AHLTA
with such criticism, Winkenwerder
said DoD is working with VA to be
able to share images of x-rays, MRIs
and CAT scans electronically. That
might happen within 18 months, he
said. Next year, work will begin on
closing other gaps in electronic
transfer capability raised by GAO.
Sen. Larry Craig (R-ID),
chairman of the Senate Veterans’
Affair
Committee, told Government Health IT
that the VA has an award-winning,
highly touted electronic health
records system while the DoD is
still
talking about requirements. This
leaves him wondering whether DoD is
just trying to justify building its
own system. Rep. Steve Buyer
(R-Ind.), Craig’s counterpart in the
House, also complained to the IT
industry newsletter. He said AHLTA
is less capable than VISTA in its
ability to share data between its
own hospitals. VISTA’s architecture
and software do not meet the
requirements of DoD. It’s sort of a
hospital by hospital system and
DoD’s need was to be able to move
the
information globally, from the
battlefield of Iraq or Afghanistan
to
Landstuhl, Germany to anywhere in
the world. The Senate
appropriations committee has urged
DoD to switch to VA’s record
system. However, Defense officials
say VISTA would need significant
modification to meet military needs
and the switch would be long and
costly. [Source: Military Update Tom
Philpott article 24 Aug 06 ++]
BEER BELLY CONTROL: Over 90 million
Americans enjoy drinking beer!
Drinking moderately has been proven
by many doctors, as well as the
New England Journal of Medicine, to
be a healthy component of
longevity. In fact, moderate
consumption of alcohol, including
beer,
has been proven to reduce the
effects of high cholesterol, heart
disease, some forms of cancer and
even impotence. Anything done in
excess is naturally unhealthy.
Moderation is defined by most
doctors
as 1-2 beers a day. And NO, you
cannot save up through the week and
catch up on the weekend drinking
10-12 beers in an evening. That is
NOT moderation. There is even a U.S.
Beer Drinking Team
(www.usbdt.com)
that links beer enthusiasts and
promotes moderation,
responsibility, and healthy living.
The average can of beer has
over 100 calories. Drinking one beer
is equivalent to eating a chocolate
chip cookie. Drinking four is
equal to eating a Big Mac Hamburger.
In order to lose weight, you
have to burn off these extra
calories as well as the other
calories
that you ate for breakfast, lunch
and dinner. Even the lightest of
beers has the empty calories of
alcohol, which is the cause of poor
health if done in excess and without
a regular exercise routine.
Unfortunately, too many Americans
live under one of the worst
stereotypes placed on a human being
- the BEER BELLY. This is caused
by excess calories in your diet and
lack of activity to burn the
extra calories. The solution to lose
your beer belly is as simple as
calories in must be less than
calories out or Calories IN <
Calories
Out (burned thru exercise) = Weight
Loss. If you can add exercise
into your schedule for 20-30 minutes
a day, your daily consumption of
alcohol (1-2 beers) will not have
any additional impact on your gut.
To lose your beer belly, you REALLY
have to watch your food and
beverage intake, drink 2-4 quarts of
water a day, and fit fitness
into your world. There is no other
healthy answer! The exercise and
workout ideas below can get you
started on your calorie burning
plan.
For more tips on burning calories
refer to
www.military.com/NewContent/0,13190,Smith_Index,00.html:
1. Workout #1: This is a great full
body calorie burner: Walk, run
or for 5 minuted + 20 squats +
10-20 Pushups + 20 situps or
crunches. Repeat 3-5 times.
2. Workout #2: Swimming and
elliptical gliding (cross country
skiing) burn the most calories per
hour (This workout can burn up to
1000 calories in one hour). Swim
20-30 minutes non-stop or elliptical
glide 20-30 minutes.
[Source: Military.com Weekly News 21
Aug 06]
PI TRICARE PROVIDER CERTIFICATION:
There are two types of provider
certification. The first is an
“institutional” certification for
hospital, clinics, pharmacy, etc.,
and the second is for
“non-institutional” providers, which
are essentially independent
doctors and specialists. Those
already certifiedin the Philippines
can be found at
http://tpaoweb.oki.med.navy.mil/
by clicking the
Tricare in the Philippines button
and then the Philippine Provider
Listing button. If the provider,
either institutional or
non-institutional, has not been
previously certified, the first
claim
filed for health services rendered
to a Tricare-eligible beneficiary
by either the beneficiary or
provider initiates the certification
process. If an institution
(hospital, clinic, pharmacy, etc.)
that
is a certified Tricare provider
employs a provider, that provider
may
or may not be certified. It depends
on the arrangement between the
institution and the providers. Since
the institution has been
certified, the cost of care
including the professional fees can
be
filed using the institution’s
certified credentials and provider
number. The institution can then pay
the provider for his/her
professional fees once reimbursement
is received from Tricare. If a
provider, however, wants to file
directly to Tricare for his/her
professional fee and not through the
institution, then he/she should
request to be certified separately
from the institution to obtain
his/her own provider number.
A beneficiary can file a claim
on a non-certified provider but
this may require the provider to
issue a letter stating they wish to
be certified by Tricare. This may
result in significant delays in the
processing of your claim(s), or
possible denial of your claim if the
provider declines certification or
cannot be certified. When you
submit a claim for service provided
by a non-certified provider, the
Tricare overseas claims processor
places a hold on the claim and
sends a request to the
Tricare-contracted certifying agent
to
initiate a certification action. The
provider is approached and asked
if they are willing to participate
in being certified by Tricare. If
your claim was denied because the
provider was not Tricare certified,
it usually means that the provider
either declined Tricare’s request,
or could not be certified for other
reasons. Unless a provider agrees
to be certified no claims filed for
services obtained from that
provider can be reimbursed by
Tricare.
If the provider was initially
unwilling to be certified and you
can convince the provider to change
their mind, then you can have the
provider submit a letter requesting
to be added to the Tricare
Provider Network to the following
address: International SOS, Inc.,
Suite 1205/6, One Magnificent Mile
Bldg, San Miguel Avenue, Ortigas
Center, Pasig City, Metro Manila,
Philippines, 1600 Tel: (63) (2)
637-0700 or Fax: (63) (2) 637-4872.
Keep in mind that you have one
year from the date of service to
resubmit a claim previously denied
due to a then-uncertified provider.
In some cases, a provider does
not meet the requirements for
certification; i.e., the provider
does
not have proper credentialing, or
does not have a valid physical
location that matches the address
given for the provider. If the
provider cannot be certified, then
you will not be reimbursed for any
out-of-pocket expenses you may have
incurred with this provider. That
is why it is highly recommend by
TAO-P that you always seek care from
a provider who has already been
Tricare certified. [Source:
http://tpaoweb.oki.med.navy.mil
Aug 06 ++]
MILITARY LEGISLATION STATUS UPDATE:
Following is current status on
some Congressional bills of interest
to the military community.
Support of these bills through
cosponsorship by other legislators
is
critical if they are ever going to
move through the legislative
process for a floor vote. At
http://thomas.loc.gov you can
determine
the current status of each bill and
if your legislator is a sponsor
of the bill you are concerned with.
The key to increasing
cosponsorship is letting your
representative know of your feelings
on
these issues. At the end of most of
the below listed bills is a web
link that can be used to do that:
H.R.303: The ‘Retired Pay
Restoration Act of 2005’ To amend
title
10, United States Code, to permit
certain additional retired members
of the Armed Forces who have a
service-connected disability to
receive both disability compensation
from the Department of Veterans
Affairs for their disability and
either retired pay by reason of
their years of military service or
Combat-Related Special
Compensation and to eliminate the
phase-in period under current law
with respect to such concurrent
receipt. No new sponsors were added
to this bill which has a total of
237. To support this bill and/or
contact your Representative refer to
http://capwiz.com/usdr/issues/bills/?bill=7728776.
H.R.602: The ‘Keep Our Promise to
America's Military Retirees Act’
to restore health care coverage to
retired members of the uniformed
services and their eligible
dependents. House version of
S.407. No
new sponsors were added to this bill
which has a total of 249.
H.R.808: The ‘Military Surviving
Spouses Equity Act’ to amend title
10, United States Code, to repeal
the offset from surviving spouse
annuities under the military
Survivor Benefit Plan for amounts
paid
by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs
as dependency and indemnity
compensation (DIC). A motion was
filed to discharge the Rules
Committee from consideration of
H.RES 271 on 16 NOV 05. This
resolution provides for the
consideration of H.R.808 and
requires 218
signatures for further action. No
new sponsors were added to this bill
which has a total of 207. To support
this bill and/or contact your
Representative refer to
http://capwiz.com/usdr/issues/bills/?bill=7683586
To support the discharge petition
and/or contact your Representative
refer to
http://capwiz.com/moaa/issues/alert/?alertid=8248891&type=CO
H.R.916: The ‘Medicare Access to
Rehabilitation Services Act of 2005’
To amend title XVIII of the Social
Security Act to repeal the Medicare
outpatient rehabilitation therapy
caps. Referred to the House
Subcommittee on Health 14 MAR 05.
House version of S.438. No new
sponsors were added to this bill
which has a total of 237. To support
this bill and/or contact your
Representative refer to
http://capwiz.com/moaa/issues/bills/?bill=7103976
&
http://capwiz.com/moaa/issues/bills/?bill=7103896.
H.R.968: To amend title 10, United
States Code, to change the
effective date for paid-up coverage
under the military Survivor
Benefit Plan from October 1, 2008,
to October 1, 2005. No new
sponsors were added to this bill
which has a total of 143. To support
this bill and/or contact your
Representative refer to
http://capwiz.com/usdr/issues/bills/?bill=7683511
H.R.994: To amend the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 to allow
Federal
civilian and military retirees to
pay health insurance premiums on a
pretax basis and to allow a
deduction for TRICARE supplemental
premiums. No new sponsors were
added to this bill which has a total
of 335. This is the House version of
S.484. To support this bill
and/or send a message to your
Representative refer to
http://capwiz.com/usdr/issues/bills/?bill=7761876
H.R.995: The ‘Combat Military
Medically Retired Veteran's Fairness
Act of 2005’ to amend title 10,
United States Code, to provide for
the payment of Combat-Related
Special Compensation under that
title
to members of the Armed Forces
retired for disability with less
than
20 years of active military service
who were awarded the Purple
Heart. No new sponsors were added to
this bill which has a total of
31. To support this bill and/or send
a message to your Representative
refer to
http://capwiz.com/usdr/issues/bills/?bill=7683281
H.R.1366: The Combat-Related
Special Compensation Act of 2005 to
amend title 10, United States Code,
to expand eligibility for
Combat-Related Special Compensation
paid by the uniformed services in
order to permit certain additional
retired members who have a
service-connected disability to
receive both disability compensation
from the Department of Veterans
Affairs for that disability and
Combat-Related Special Compensation
by reason of that disability. No
new sponsors were added to this bill
which has a total of 51. There
are no related bills. To support
this bill send a message to your
Representative refer to
http://capwiz.com/usdr/issues/bills/?bill=7718711
To support Sen. Reid’s amendment to
the 2007 NDAA bill S.2766 send a
message to your Representative refer
to
http://capwiz.com/usdr/issues/alert/?alertid=8371516&type=ML
H.R.2076: The ‘Retired Pay
Restoration Act of 2005’ To amend
title
10, United States Code, to permit
certain retired members of the
uniformed services who have a
service-connected disability to
receive
both disability compensation from
the Department of Veterans Affairs
for their disability and either
retired pay by reason of their years
of military service or
Combat-Related Special
Compensation. No new
sponsors were added to this bill
which has a total of 28. Related
bills are H.R.303, S.558, S.845. To
support this bill and/or send a
message to your Representative refer
to
http://capwiz.com/usdr/issues/bills/?bill=7728776
H.R.2356: The ‘Preserving Patient
Access to Physicians Act of 2005’
to amend title XVIII of the Social
Security Act to reform the
Medicare physician payment update
system through repeal of the
sustainable growth rate (SGR)
payment update system. No new
sponsors
were added to this bill which has a
total of 173. Related bills are
S.1081. To support this bill and/or
send a message to your
Representative refer to
http://capwiz.com/usdr/issues/bills/?bill=7742321.
H.R.2962: The ‘Atomic Veterans
Relief Act’ to amend title 38,
United
States Code, to revise the
eligibility criteria for presumption
of
service-connection of certain
diseases and disabilities for
veterans
exposed to ionizing radiation during
military service, and for other
purposes. No new sponsors were
added to this bill which has a total
of 52. There are no other related
bills. To support this bill and/or
send a message to your
Representative refer to
http://capwiz.com/usdr/issues/bills/?bill=7784066
H.R.4914: The ‘Veterans right to
Know Act’ to establish a Commission
to investigate chemical or
biological warfare tests or
projects,
especially such projects carried out
between 1954 and 1973, placing
particular emphasis on actions or
conditions associated with such
projects that could have contributed
to health risks or been harmful
to any United States civilian
personnel or member of the United
States Armed Forces who participated
in such a project or who was
otherwise potentially exposed to any
biological or chemical agent,
simulant, tracer, decontaminant, or
herbicide as a result of such
projects; and to submit a report to
Congress of its findings and
recommendations. No new sponsors
were added to this bill which has a
total of 40. There are no other
related bills. Referred to the House
Subcommittee on Military Personnel
30 NOV 05.
H.R.4914: The ‘Veterans' Choice of
Representation Act’ to amend title
38, United States Code, to remove
certain limitations on attorney
representation of claimants for
veterans benefits in administrative
proceedings before the Department of
Veterans Affairs, and for other
purposes. No new sponsors were
added to this bill which has a total
of 8. There are no other related
bills. To support this bill and/or
send a message to your
Representative refer to
http://capwiz.com/usdr/issues/bills/?bill=8835676
H.R.4949: The ‘Military Retirees
Health Care Protection Act’ to amend
title 10, United States Code, to
prohibit increases in fees for
military health care. No new
sponsors were added to this bill
which
has a total of 160. There are no
other related bills. To support
this bill and/or send a message to
your Representative refer to
http://capwiz.com/usdr/issues/bills/?bill=8591231
H.R.4992: The ‘Veterans Medicare
Assistance Act of 2006’ to provide
for Medicare reimbursement for
health care services provided to
Medicare-eligible veterans in
facilities of the Department of
Veterans Affairs. No new sponsors
were added to this bill which has
a total of 20. There are no other
related bills. To support this
bill and/or send a message to your
Representative refer to
http://capwiz.com/usdr/index_frame.dbq?url=http://capwiz.com/usdr/issues/bills/?bill=8670886
H.R.5881: The ‘Disabled Veterans Tax
Termination Act’ to amend title
10, United States Code, to eliminate
the offset between military
retired pay and veterans
service-connected disability
compensation
for certain retired members of the
Armed Forces who have a
service-connected disability, and
for other purposes. Introduced 26
JUL 06 by Rep Marshall, Jim (GA-03)
the bill has no cosponsors. There
are no other related bills. To
support this bill and/or send a
message
to your Representative refer to
http://capwiz.com/usdr/index_frame.dbq?url=http://capwiz.com/usdr/issues/alert/?alertid=8969606&queueid=[capwiz:queue_id]
S.185: The ‘Military Retiree
Survivor Benefit Equity Act of 2005’
to
amend title 10, United States Code,
to repeal the requirement for the
reduction of certain Survivor
Benefit Plan annuities by the amount
of
dependency and indemnity
compensation and to modify the
effective date
for paid-up coverage under the
Survivor Benefit Plan. No new
sponsors
were added to this bill which has a
total of 35. There are no other
related bills. To support this bill
and/or send a message to your
Senator refer to
http://capwiz.com/usdr/issues/bills/?bill=7709421
S.407: The ‘Keep Our Promise to
America's Military Retirees Act’ to
restore health care coverage to
retired members of the uniformed
services and their eligible
dependents. No new sponsors were
added to
this bill which has a total of 14. A
related bill is H.R.602. To
support this bill and/or send a
message to your Senator refer to
http://mrgrg-ms.org/fax-it.html
S.484: To amend the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986 to allow Federal
civilian and military retirees to
pay health insurance premiums on a
pretax basis and to allow a
deduction for Tricare supplemental
premiums. No new sponsors were added
to this bill which has a total
of 63. A related bill is H.R.994. To
support this bill and/or send a
message to your Senator refer to
http://capwiz.com/usdr/issues/bills/?bill=7787396
S.2147: The ‘Multiple Sclerosis’
bill to extend the 7 year time
period during which a veteran's
multiple sclerosis is to be
considered to have been incurred in,
or aggravated by, military
service during a period of war.
Referred to the Senate Committee on
Veterans' Affairs 20 DEC 05. The
bill has no cosponsors and there is
no related legislation in the
House.
S.2617: The ‘Military Retirees
Health Care Protection Act’ to amend
title 10, United States Code, to
limit increases in the costs to
retired members of the Armed Forces
of health care services under the
TRICARE program, and for other
purposes. No new sponsors were
added
to this bill which has a total of 9.
There are no other related
bills. To support this bill and/or
send a message to your Senator
refer to
http://capwiz.com/usdr/issues/alert/?alertid=8675066&type=CO
S.2658: The ‘National Defense
Enhancement and National Guard
Empowerment Act of 2006’ to amend
title 10, United States Code, to
enhance the national defense through
empowerment of the Chief of the
National Guard Bureau and the
enhancement of the functions of the
National Guard Bureau, and for other
purposes. No new sponsors were
added to this bill which has a total
of 39. A related bill is
H.R.5200. To support this bill send
a preformatted or edited message
to your Senator by using the “Write
to Congress” feature refer to
www.ngaus.org.
S.2694: The ‘Veterans' Choice of
Representation and Benefits
Enhancement Act of 2006’ to amend
title 38, United States Code, to
remove certain limitation on
attorney representation of claimants
for
veterans’ benefits in administrative
proceedings before the DVA, and
for other purposes. This bill was
passed/agreed to in Senate 3 AUG
06 by unanimous consent. To support
this bill and/or send a message
to your Senator refer to
http://capwiz.com/usdr/issues/bills/?bill=8835631
Note: The House of Representatives
is out of session 31 July thru 3
Sept. The Senate is out of session
7 AUG thru 3 SEP. There are only
68 days until Election Day. Be sure
you are registered to vote and
make your vote count. . [Source:
USDR Action Alerts 15-31 Aug 06 ++]
Lt. James “EMO” Tichacek, USN (Ret)
Director, Retiree Assistance Office,
U.S. Embassy Warden & VITA
Baguio City RP
PSC 517 Box RCB, FPO AP 96517
Tel: (760) 839-9003 or FAX 1(801)
760-2430; When in RP: (74) 442-7135
or FAX 1(801) 760-2430
Email: raoemo@sbcglobal.net. When
in Philippines raoemo@mozcom.com
Web:
http://post_119_gulfport_ms.tripod.com/rao1.html
AL/AMVETS/DAV/FRA/NAUS/NCOA/MOAA/USDR/VFW/VVA/CG33/DD890/AD37
member
BULLETIN SUBSCRIPTION NOTES:
== To subscribe first add both the
above email addees to your address
book and then provide your full name
plus either the
post/branch/chapter number of the
fraternal military/government
organization you are currently
affiliated with (if any) “AND/OR”
the
city and state/country you reside in
so your addee can be properly
positioned in the directory for
future recovery. Subscription is
open to everyone except AOL users.
After purging 12,212 blocked AOL
subscribers from the Bulletin
directory it presently lists 47,375
subscribers
== To automatically change your
email addee or remove yourself from
Bulletin distribution click the
below or send a message which
includes your full name plus your
old & new email addee.
_____________________________
Change address / Leave mailing list:
http://ymlp.com/u.php?raoemo+duboisb@lan.newpaltz.edu
Hosting by YourMailingListProvider

|